Monday, 27 April 2015

Only a 'X' will do

Subtitle:
Can you mix
Politics with Religion?


I was brought up to believe that one of the most taboo combinations in conversation is that of religion and politics.  You are bound to upset, alienate or annoy someone sooner or later if they are broached.  And some people manipulate a situation by deliberately pressing those buttons.
One day some men came up to Jesus to attempt to do just that.  They knew that Jesus was regarded as a Rabbi; a teacher.  They knew that he was proclaiming a different way of relating to God; a personal way; a way that valued the individual.  They had heard him read these words of Isaiah in a synagogue:

The spirit of the Lord God is upon me, because the Lord has anointed me; he has sent me to bring good news to the oppressed, to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and release to the prisoners; (Ch61)

And somehow when Jesus read these ancient words they had a new revolutionary quality about them.  The politically minded of the Roman occupation and the temple authority suddenly looked up and saw someone mixing religion with politics. So they challenged him with a question.  They said,

Teacher, we know that you teach the way of God truthfully, and do not regard the position of men as important, tell us then, what do you think, is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar or not?

Now this little episode must have been significant to the early church as it appears in 3 of the 4 Gospels, where as, for example, the Christmas story is only told in two.
Jesus asked them for a handful of coins and said, ‘Whose likeness is this?, they said, obviously, ‘Caesar’s’.

“Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s!’, 
Jesus replied.  
And they went away amazed.

In that short answer had Jesus separated politics and religion;
the material and spiritual,
the earthly and divine, or what?

The people of Jesus’ day would have understood from their scriptures that God was at the root of all creation.  Humanity was made in the image of God, and God yearns for humanity to find it’s way back to that innate goodness. Even Caesar, or what he represented is in the end subject to God, or of God’s creation.  You could argue that Jesus was saying that all of this is God’s.  Caesar and others like him are just stewards of those resources and responsible to their fellow human beings as a consequence. 
So the point is not who or what you give to whom, but what are the intentions; the aspirations and the motivations of those who are given the power; or given the taxes.  All the while we focus on the personality, the presentation and whose is on the placard, billboard or TV debate, or indeed, in Jesus day, the coin, then we miss whether or not the true values of humanity are being addressed.
When Tony Benn was asked if you should mix politics with religion he said, 
No, but you should mix politics with faith! 
I think Jesus would have liked that answer!


Sunday, 16 November 2014

Gnashing of Teeth

Jesus speaks of the gnashing of teeth a lot in his parables and teachings.  Therefore we hear it a lot.  But I wonder if we have ever thought about what it actually means or signifies.
I find myself thinking about a certain dog in a certain comic with a menacing Dennis as its master.
When it does appear it often appears at the end of a story or description or explanation.  It is often what we are left with.  So it ought to have significance and not just be glossed over as a quaint turn of phrase from the time.

If you look up a definition for gnashing you will find it describes the grinding of teeth in anger.  It is an expression of rage.  Often a rage inspired by great pain.  I once heard an example of gnashing as being what you instinctively do if you hit your thumb with a hammer or stub your toe badly.  You squeeze your eyes closed, grind your teeth and vocalise your reaction through your closed teeth.  You get the idea.
However in scripture that gnashing of teeth of often partnered with weeping.  We hear described, the weeping and gnashing of teeth.  And here it takes on a new kind of dread.  Anger and pain coupled with a tremendous sorrow.  And in many scriptural contexts the implication is that the weeping and gnashing of teeth will last an eternity.
It’s a part of our faith analogy to which we don’t often go if we are honest.  But Jesus did on a number of occasions.  And many of those occasions are about the Kingdom of God.  We are in a little part of the Christian Year known as the Kingdom Season and Advent, shortly to be upon us, is set against the hope of the kingdom to come.  So we’d better sit up and take notice of what Jesus means and what it could mean to us.
Jesus’ first reference to weeping and gnashing of teeth comes in Matthew 8:12 where He compares the kingdom of heaven where “many” come from all parts of the world to “recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.” Those who don’t come near are described as being in the  “outer darkness” where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth, a description of a horrible fate. In His parable of the weeds sown in the field, Jesus again describes the fate of those who reject Him, this time adding to the description “the fiery furnace” into which they will be cast (Matthew 13:41-42). The story of the guest who comes to the wedding feast of the Lamb without the proper clothing (salvation) is cast into outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 22:11-13), as is the wicked servant described in Matthew 24:44-51 and the worthless servant in the parable of the talents, which was the story that prompted my reflection.
All these references to weeping and gnashing of teeth have one thing in common—the undeniable fact that those who do are outside the kingdom, those who reject God and goodness, will find themselves in a kind of darkness, and will suffer  this frustration.  

A Vicar once preached on the gnashing of teeth in eternity and a worried elderly lady in the congregation afterwards presented the problem. 'I don't have any teeth'.  The Vicar replied solemnly. 'Teeth will be provided.'

The contrast is what we find in Revelation.
“He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away"
The pain that causes the gnashing of teeth will be unknown in heaven, and there will be no weeping, no wailing, and no tears. The sorrow and death that cause us to weep and mourn will be a thing of the past. Sickness, death, persecution, and sin will be no more.

At one time you would have found this polarisation of the afterlife into a place of horror and suffering and a place of peace and comfort, common currency in frightening people towards some form of reluctant salvation. 

The threat of the place of teeth gnashing was also used by those in authority to scare people into a submission to suit their needs or the needs of a particular community.

Society at large now ridicules this part of the Christian purveyance and doesn’t take it seriously.  And when the evangelistic process relies heavily on this kind of rhetoric then it too loses its credibility and the ability to impart anything about God, Christ and the Christian faith is hampered.

We could, then, all sit back and say, well, we won’t bother with them then. They’ll find out one day and realise they were wrong.

Or we could say, prayerfully, what is God now telling us about this part of the faith story that is being challenged and taken apart.  For remember God can speak to us through those who we think don’t have faith.

Like many things to do with our faith and its interpretation it deserves another look to see where God is now pointing us.
When we look at references to the weeping and gnashing, they are all concerned with a negative eternal experience following an active rejection of God, and, probably by implication, following an evil motivated life style.

The thing is they are references that are only used by Jesus.  Only Jesus dares to tell us about this dreadful condition.  Not Paul, or the prophets, or Abraham or Moses, or Ruth or Sara, or John the Baptist.  Only Jesus dares to tell us this, and when he does he says that the judgement will by ‘my father in heaven’.  In other words it is a God centred decisions as to who ends up teeth gnashing. 
For too long human beings have tried to invent calculating and defined ways to describe people as either saved and safe or unsaved and dangerous.  And even if we could define someone as a definite believer who are we to then say that someone else who doesn’t reach that same profile is therefore lost in the outer darkness. 
In Jesus’ parables only God is the discerner or all that.  We are the tellers of the gospel and the supporters and nurturers, and the rest is between that person and God.
And here’s another clue.  The weeping and gnashing of teeth appears in stories.  Stories of feasts and servants, debts and talents.  Its all part of the analogy to describe the indescribable.  In John 14 Jesus depicts the afterlife experience as a house with many mansions, many rooms, actually many dwelling places.  That doesn't mean the faithful are going to find themselves in a nicely decorated double glazed Barrets home.  The analogy was to convey the sense of dwelling; of being with God, and the peace and comfort that will bring.
Likewise the image of rolling tears and dental tensions, was a way of putting over the feeling of being without God.  If God is light, then without God is darkness.  We mustn’t presume that because someone doesn’t use the words we use or the religious phrases we use that they are without God.  Likewise someone can emulate the Christian profile and be far from the God of love.
St Paul says to his Thessalonians, Therefore encourage one another and build up each other, as indeed you are doing.  And Jesus did more about encouraging his followers than he did about warning about the darkness.  And he found pre-existent faith as well….you faith has cured you’’’’he would say.

As Christians we do care that people come close to the God of love, the God of light, and that they do so for all sorts of positive reasons.  Come into the light because you want to see, not because you are afraid of the darkness.

Therefore encourage one another and build up each other, as indeed you are doing. 











Sunday, 8 December 2013

A Sermon for Advent 2, 2013



A Sermon for Advent 2, 2013

Recently in the news some science has come out declaring that men’s and women’s brains are wired differently.

Male brains appeared to be wired front to back, with few connections bridging the two hemispheres.
In females, the pathways criss-crossed between left and right.

These differences might explain, the scientists speculate, why men, in general, tend to be better at learning and performing a single task, like cycling or navigating, whereas women are more equipped for multitasking, say the researchers in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

The only problem with all this is it gives permission to bring up all those stereotypical male female differences that we think exist, whether the science supports them or not, and all that results in is a kind of separatism between men and women, something that, in my generation at least, we’ve been trying to work away from for all sorts of human rights reasons.

Even the scientists admit that so called brain hardwiring can evolve and change as people learn and develop, thus undermining these so called differences.

This week in the season of Advent we think of the prophets who, according to the biblical recorders and our tradition, were mostly men.  There are, however, a significant number of women in our scripture, who deserve the description of prophet but get masked by a long tradition that only seems to hear the male voice.

Isaiah, perhaps the most well known of the prophets, considered the mother of his children to be a prophetess (Is8:3) and both Hannah, mother of Samuel, and Mary Mother of Jesus are well known for their songs which contain powerful prophecies about materialism being overthrown by poverty, and the poor and weak having their day and being blessed by God.  Those words alone make them prophets.
Miriam, sister of Aaron and Moses, is described in exodus as a prophetess, and in the book of Judges, Deborah, a judge over Israel, displays all the qualities and duties of her male prophet counterparts, and there are many more.

A prophet is someone who is sent, someone with a message, someone who is a mouthpiece for a truth, and ethic and a belief.  Many prophets come out of suffering and hardship,  Indeed you could argue that such harsh experience can be a catalyst for prophetic ability and inspiration.  You see, as I have said many times before, prophets are not fortune tellers or future tellers. 
Prophets don’t tell you what is going to happen, they tell you what will happen if…….
they tell you what consequences will befall if…….
and they tell you what can be achieved if……

The most startling of these prophecies, which humanity has yet to fully achieve is that shared by Micah and Isaiah where they say:
They will beat their swords into plowshares
    and their spears into pruning hooks.
Nation will not take up sword against nation,
    nor will they train for war anymore.
Everyone will sit under their own vine
    and under their own fig tree,
and no one will make them afraid,
    for the Lord Almighty has spoken.
All the nations may walk
    in the name of their gods,
but we will walk in the name of the Lord
    our God for ever and ever.

Most if not all of the prophets, in their different ways, spoke out against separatism, against oppression and against violence and for an inclusive humanity under the God of love.

And most, if not all prophets were ordinary people who somehow found themselves caught up with a cause, a direction or a truth, and decided to follow it.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu described Nelson Mandela as a prophet of tolerance.  And as, in the wake of his death, Mandela’s story is recounted and assessed, his place as a modern day prophet is starkly clear.

Mandela’s motivation was powered by an opposition to the most abhorrent form of separatism, that of race and colour:
Apartheid – from an Afrikaans word meaning ‘The state of being apart’ became a great crime as it manifested itself in both major and trivial ways, etching away at human dignity at an everyday level, and causing conflict and retaliation at other levels as people and organisations were banned and declared illegal and people imprisoned and life taken.
When Mandela was eventually freed from his imprisonment, after some 27 years of captivity, he remarked that true freedom only comes with forgiveness.

For him, to be entrapped in dispute, in revenge or in conflict was no better than being in that small cell on Robben Island.  It has been said of Mandela that for him and enemy was a friend waiting to be made.

And it was these powerful attitudes that fuelled his optimistic understanding that reconciliation was the only way forward, and was the solution to this aberrant segregation and humiliation of his fellow human beings.

All the nations may walk
    in the name of their gods,

He had been scrupulous to ensure that he demonstrated a profound respect for all the faiths to be found in his country. After he was elected by Parliament as the first democratically elected President on 9 May 1994, on the Friday he went to a mosque and on the following day he attended a synagogue and on the Sunday attended a larger inter-denominational service at the FNB Stadium in Soweto. At his inauguration, prayers were offered by Muslim, Jewish, Hindu and Christian ministers.
Everyone will sit under their own vine
    and under their own fig tree,
I heard a sports reporter on the radio remember Mandela making a surprise visit to a football stadium, at the anxiety of his security, wandered through the crowd talking to people.  One man in a wheelchair shouted out’ your achievement has been great’ and his answer was, yes it has been great hasn’t it, but its your achievement.

His self deprecation was part of his power. He once addressed the labour party conference, describing himself as an unemployed pensioner with a criminal record, and the went on to speak of tolerance, forgiveness and reconciliation.

And so on this second Sunday in Advent, when we remember all those who cried out from various wildernesses, about the truth of a loving God and a capable humanity,

may our second Advent candle glow with their prophetic voice, and for now help us remember the gift of Nelson Mandela’s life, prophecy and example.

Archbishop Tutu’s prayer

"We offer a prayer of contrition. We come with humble and broken hearts for all the ways we have fallen short of the glory of God.

"We come carrying our sorrow for all of the ways that we have fallen short of the example that Madiba offered us; an example of integrity, of reconciliation, of leadership in the service of the people.

"So we thank God for Rolihlahla. We thank God that this man had the courage to learn and to grow.